[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpo=nWsUh5y7y_tacGez7uN76QbRFRVPSQcKQMGM1nUBWtw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 12:01:05 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org,
robin.randhawa@....com, Steve.Bannister@....com,
Liviu.Dudau@....com, charles.garcia-tobin@....com,
arvind.chauhan@....com, davem@...emloft.net, airlied@...hat.com,
axboe@...nel.dk, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/4] block: queue work on unbound wq
Hi Tejun,
On 31 March 2013 23:49, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> So, let's please introduce a new flag to mark these workqueues, say,
> WQ_UNBOUND_FOR_POWER_SAVE or whatever (please come up with a better
> name) and provide a compile time switch with boot time override.
Just wanted to make this clear before writing it:
You want me to do something like (With better names):
int wq_unbound_for_power_save_enabled = 0;
#ifdef CONFIG_WQ_UNBOUND_FOR_POWER_SAVE
#define WQ_UNBOUND_FOR_POWER_SAVE wq_unbound_for_power_save_enabled
#else
#define WQ_UNBOUND_FOR_POWER_SAVE 0
And provide a call to enable/disable wq_unbound_for_power_save_enabled ??
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists