[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130402221110.485998030@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 15:10:36 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...ionio.com>
Subject: [ 054/124] Btrfs: use set_nlink if our i_nlink is 0
3.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@...ionio.com>
commit 9bf7a4890518186238d2579be16ecc5190a707c0 upstream.
We need to inc the nlink of deleted entries when running replay so we can do the
unlink on the fs_root and get everything cleaned up and then have the orphan
cleanup do the right thing. The problem is inc_nlink complains about this, even
thought it still does the right thing. So use set_nlink() if our i_nlink is 0
to keep users from seeing the warnings during log replay. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@...ionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
@@ -1384,7 +1384,10 @@ static noinline int link_to_fixup_dir(st
btrfs_release_path(path);
if (ret == 0) {
- btrfs_inc_nlink(inode);
+ if (!inode->i_nlink)
+ set_nlink(inode, 1);
+ else
+ btrfs_inc_nlink(inode);
ret = btrfs_update_inode(trans, root, inode);
} else if (ret == -EEXIST) {
ret = 0;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists