[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130402221107.859081735@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 15:10:14 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: [ 032/124] vt: synchronize_rcu() under spinlock is not nice...
3.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
commit e8cd81693bbbb15db57d3c9aa7dd90eda4842874 upstream.
vcs_poll_data_free() calls unregister_vt_notifier(), which calls
atomic_notifier_chain_unregister(), which calls synchronize_rcu().
Do it *after* we'd dropped ->f_lock.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/tty/vt/vc_screen.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/tty/vt/vc_screen.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/vt/vc_screen.c
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ vcs_poll_data_free(struct vcs_poll_data
static struct vcs_poll_data *
vcs_poll_data_get(struct file *file)
{
- struct vcs_poll_data *poll = file->private_data;
+ struct vcs_poll_data *poll = file->private_data, *kill = NULL;
if (poll)
return poll;
@@ -122,10 +122,12 @@ vcs_poll_data_get(struct file *file)
file->private_data = poll;
} else {
/* someone else raced ahead of us */
- vcs_poll_data_free(poll);
+ kill = poll;
poll = file->private_data;
}
spin_unlock(&file->f_lock);
+ if (kill)
+ vcs_poll_data_free(kill);
return poll;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists