[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130402003746.GA30444@blaptop>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 09:37:46 +0900
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] THP: Use explicit memory barrier
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 04:35:38PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Apr 2013, Minchan Kim wrote:
>
> > __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page depends on page_add_new_anon_rmap's
> > spinlock for making sure that clear_huge_page write become visible
> > after set set_pmd_at() write.
> >
> > But lru_cache_add_lru uses pagevec so it could miss spinlock
> > easily so above rule was broken so user may see inconsistent data.
> >
> > This patch fixes it with using explict barrier rather than depending
> > on lru spinlock.
> >
>
> Is this the same issue that Andrea responded to in the "thp and memory
> barrier assumptions" thread at http://marc.info/?t=134333512700004 ?
Yes and Peter pointed out further step.
Thanks for pointing out.
Not that I know that Andrea alreay noticed it, I don't care about this
patch.
Remaining question is Kame's one.
Isn't there anyone could answer it?
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@...ck.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists