[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130402045105.GA17682@the-dreams.de>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 06:52:37 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / I2C: Use parent's ACPI_HANDLE() in
acpi_i2c_register_devices()
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 02:25:03AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> The ACPI handle of struct i2c_adapter's dev member should not be
> set, because this causes that struct i2c_adapter to be associated
> with the ACPI device node corresponding to its parent as the
> second "physical_device", which is incorrect (this happens during
> the registration of struct i2c_adapter). Consequently,
> acpi_i2c_register_devices() should use the ACPI handle of the
> parent of the struct i2c_adapter it is called for rather than the
> struct i2c_adapter's ACPI handle (which should be NULL).
>
> Make that happen and modify the i2c-designware-platdrv driver,
> which currently is the only driver for ACPI-enumerated I2C
> controller chips, not to set the ACPI handle for the
> struct i2c_adapter it creates.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Shall this go via the I2C tree? If not, for the I2C part:
Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists