[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1364887357.4208.6.camel@amber.site>
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 09:22:37 +0200
From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: gpio-ucb1400
Le lundi 01 avril 2013 à 16:32 +0100, Mark Brown a écrit :
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 01:06:43PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
>
> > My point was, the upstream gpio-ucb1400 driver in its current form is
> > unusable (on top of being ugly.) I have no doubt that someone used that
> > driver successfully in some external kernel tree, but the code that was
> > merged upstream is incomplete and no good.
>
> What the driver is doing is, unfortunately, the best practice for an
> AC'97 connected device like this - we've got an uncomfortable mix of
> an enumerable bus and platform data combined with a subsystem which has
> never had enough love to work in a nice way with the kernel. The idea
> is that any boards which have the device will call the _set_data()
> function in their board-specific code.
OK but where are these users? I can't see any in the upstream kernel.
> Sadly we're a little short on volunteers to clean up the AC'97
> subsystem so this situation shows little sign of improving.
Well Marek proposed a cleanup which looked good [1], several times
apparently, but it was never applied.
[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2010-October/028656.html
--
Jean Delvare
Suse L3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists