[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130402092446.GB4375@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 10:24:46 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@...aro.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Srinidhi Kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@...ricsson.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: ux500: update V-INTCORE constraints
> > > I know that Lee's been sending off a large set of regulator patches
> > > lately, some include alterations to this platform config.
> >
> > > Maybe it's better to take this patch into the regulator tree if these
> > > machine configs will come in that way? Also like Lee to have a
> > > look at this...
> >
> > If it's touching the board constraints it's likely to have conflicts
> > with Lee's stuff, yes.
>
> Lee's patches are on -next
Not all of them are on -next, but all are on the MLs.
I'm currently fixing up some of Mark's review comments in order to
re-submit the remainder.
> and should not conflict with this one
> (tested again on today's tree), but it may be nice anyway to have this
> in the regulator framework with the others.
> Mark, would you consider taking this one in your tree?
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists