[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1364896813.18374.0.camel@laptop>
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 12:00:13 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] sched: factor out code to should_we_balance()
On Tue, 2013-04-02 at 18:50 +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>
> It seems that there is some misunderstanding about this patch.
> In this patch, we don't iterate all groups. Instead, we iterate on
> cpus of local sched_group only. So there is no penalty you mentioned.
OK, I'll go stare at it again..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists