[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130402133114.GC5488@pd.tnic>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 15:31:14 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@....com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] cpufreq: ondemand: allow custom
powersave_bias_target function to be registered
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 01:24:16PM -0500, Jacob Shin wrote:
> @@ -206,8 +209,8 @@ static void od_check_cpu(int cpu, unsigned int load_freq)
> __cpufreq_driver_target(policy, freq_next,
> CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
> } else {
> - int freq = powersave_bias_target(policy, freq_next,
> - CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
> + int freq = od_ops.powersave_bias_target(policy,
> + freq_next, CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
> __cpufreq_driver_target(policy, freq,
> CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
Btw, one more thing: you can simplify this code a bit, while you're at
it:
if (!od_tuners->powersave_bias) {
__cpufreq_driver_target(policy, freq_next,
CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
return;
}
freq_next = od_ops.powersave_bias_target(policy, freq_next, CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
__cpufreq_driver_target(policy, freq, CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
}
and drop the local "int freq" too.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists