[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130402153957.GG29506@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 11:39:57 -0400
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, WANG Chao <chaowang@...hat.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kexec: use Crash kernel for Crash kernel low
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 07:45:36AM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
[..]
> 2. keep thing unified when new kexec-tools is used: always high.
I think this is wrong. What if system does not have more than 4G of
memory. crashkernel=x,high will fail. So just because we have new version
of kexec-tools, it does not mean that one can always use crashkernel=x,high.
I think we should do two things.
- Extend crashkernel=X to search for memory below 896M, 4G, MAXMEM in
that order. To me, this will work best for most of the users.
- For users who really care to not allocate memory in low memory ranges,
they can use crashkernel=X,high. But even there syntax should be that
look for memory in higher ranges first otherwise allocate from low
regions.
Otherwise it makes life very difficult for a user when there is no
memory available in higher addresses but it is available in low addresses.
How does one automate that.
In current form, I double crashkernel=X,high is going to be very useful.
Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists