[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQU99i+fBLnCq72c17XTALdsuUS5jrANAbL=1aMm7=mahw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 08:46:16 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, WANG Chao <chaowang@...hat.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kexec: use Crash kernel for Crash kernel low
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 07:45:36AM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>
> [..]
>> 2. keep thing unified when new kexec-tools is used: always high.
>
> I think this is wrong. What if system does not have more than 4G of
> memory. crashkernel=x,high will fail. So just because we have new version
> of kexec-tools, it does not mean that one can always use crashkernel=x,high.
no, it will not fail.
If the system have less 4G, and memblock will still find the ram for us.
Thanks
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists