linux-kernel - RE: [PATCHv2, RFC 20/30] ramfs: enable transparent huge page cache

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130402162813.0B4CBE0085@blue.fi.intel.com>
Date:	Tue,  2 Apr 2013 19:28:12 +0300 (EEST)
From:	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc:	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
	Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCHv2, RFC 20/30] ramfs: enable transparent huge page cache

Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> ramfs is the most simple fs from page cache point of view. Let's start
> transparent huge page cache enabling here.
> 
> For now we allocate only non-movable huge page. It's not yet clear if
> movable page is safe here and what need to be done to make it safe.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>  fs/ramfs/inode.c |    6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ramfs/inode.c b/fs/ramfs/inode.c
> index c24f1e1..da30b4f 100644
> --- a/fs/ramfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ramfs/inode.c
> @@ -61,7 +61,11 @@ struct inode *ramfs_get_inode(struct super_block *sb,
>  		inode_init_owner(inode, dir, mode);
>  		inode->i_mapping->a_ops = &ramfs_aops;
>  		inode->i_mapping->backing_dev_info = &ramfs_backing_dev_info;
> -		mapping_set_gfp_mask(inode->i_mapping, GFP_HIGHUSER);
> +		/*
> +		 * TODO: what should be done to make movable safe?
> +		 */
> +		mapping_set_gfp_mask(inode->i_mapping,
> +				GFP_TRANSHUGE & ~__GFP_MOVABLE);

Hugh, I've found old thread with the reason why we have GFP_HIGHUSER here, not
GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE:

http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/11/27/156

It seems the origin reason is not longer valid, correct?

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/