linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.8-stable] regulator: core: Log when a device causes a voltage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130402184411.GA21927@kroah.com>
Date:	Tue, 2 Apr 2013 11:44:11 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@...sung.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	'Liam Girdwood' <lrg@...com>,
	'Mark Brown' <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	'Russ Dill' <Russ.Dill@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.8-stable] regulator: core: Log when a device causes a
 voltage

On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 06:30:42PM +0900, Jonghwan Choi wrote:
> 3.8-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

Who is "us"?  :)

It's a bit nicer to say, "This patch looks like it should be in the
3.8-stable tree, should we apply it?"

That way, the default, if no one replies, is that the patch is not
applied (safer), not that it will be applied.  I need/require that the
authors/maintainers agree that any patch they don't explicitly mark for
the stable tree, yet people think it should be, to be acknowledged by
them.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/