lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1364930854.9268.0.camel@wall-e>
Date:	Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:27:34 +0200
From:	Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>
To:	Anatol Pomozov <anatol.pomozov@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>,
	Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>, JeffMoyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: losetup kernel crash in drivers/block/loop.c kernel 3.4.11

Cool.... Thanks for the fix.

Am Montag, den 01.04.2013, 05:04 -0700 schrieb Anatol Pomozov:
> Hi
> 
> 
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 1:51 AM, Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>
> wrote:
>         Hi,
>         
>         i am faced with a strange kernel crash while removing a
>         loopback device
>         with losetup, during a software update of my embedded device,
>         which was
>         introduced between 3.0 and 3.4. All other used kernels 2.6.39,
>         2.6.35,
>         2.6.33, 2.6.29, 2.6.27 and 2.6.20 works well.
>         
>         BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer derference at
>         00000041
>         IP: [<c019faef>] invalidate_bdev+0x4/0x26
>         *pde = 00000000
>         Ooops: 0000 I#11 PREEMNT SMP
>         Modules linked in: vfat fat i915 drm_kms_helper drm intel_agp
>         i2c_algo_bit intel_gtt agpgart video backlight e1000e
>         usb_storage
>         
>         Pid: 869, comm: losetup Tainted G            8.3.4
>         EIP: 0060:[<c0194aef>] EFLAGS: 00010282 CPU: 1
>         EIP is at invalidate_bdev+0x4/0x26
>         EAX: 00000029 EBX: f63c1c00 ECX: 00000000 EDX: f63c1e20
>         ESI: f5c6bc80 EDI: f63c1c60 EBP: f596e500 ESP: f5053e54
>          DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0068
>         CR0: 8005003b CR2: 00000041 CR3: 324ae000 CR4: 000407d0
>         DR0: 00000000 DR1: 00000000 DR2: 00000000 DR3: 00000000
>         DR6: ffff0ff0 DR7: 00000400
>         Process losetup (pid: 869, ti=f5052000 task=f616c0c0
>         task.ti=f5052000)
>         Stack:
>          f63c1c00 c0277449 000200da f63c1c00 ffffffe7 00004c01
>         f5c39900 c02784d0
>          f5d750a4 00000000 f5053efc f5d750a4 f5269900 c017dda6
>         0000001d 00008000
>          f63c1cfc c027897b ffffffe7 00004c01 f5053f10 c0202021
>         00000000 f5c39900
>         Call Trace:
>          [<c0277449>] ? loop_clr_fd+0x11/0x1d6
>          [<c02784d0>] ? lo_ioctl+0x455/0x62b
>          [<c017dda6>] ? do_last.clone.32+0x55b/0x5d5
>          [<c027807b>] ? loop_switch.clone.13+0x67/0x67
>          [<c0202021>] ? __blkdev_driver_ioctl+0x1d/0x25
>          [<c0202905>] ? blkdev_ioctl+0x6a3/0x6c2
>          [<c016800d>] ? handle_pte_fault+0x21d/0x7ad
>          [<c017e19b>] ? do_file_open+0x21/0x5d
>          [<c019425b>] ? block_ioctl+0x2f/0x34
>          [<c019425b>] ? block_ioctl+0x2f/0x34
>          [<c019422c>] ? bd_set_size+0x60/0x60
>          [<c017fe00>] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0x455/0x492
>          [<c01181d3>] ? do_page_fault+0x30f/0x32c
>          [<c017293a>] ? fd_install+0x1e/0x3d
>          [<c0173865>] ? do_sys_open+0x17e/0x188
>          [<c017feea>] ? sys_ioctl+0x2d/0x47
>          [<c033f7c1>] ? syscall+0x7/0xb
>         Code: 00 89 f0 5b 5e 5f c3 53 8b 40 08 8b 58 18 83 7b 3c 00 74
>         11 e8 3f b9 ff ff 89 d8 31 d2 31 c9 5b e9 ba 8e fc ff 5b c3 53
>         8b 40 08 (8b) 58 18 83 7b 3c 00 74 17 e8  1f b9 ff ff e8 4e 88
>         fc ff 89 d8
>         EIP: [<c019eaef>] invalidate_bdev+0x4/0x26 SS:ESP
>         0068:f5053e54
>         CR2: 0000000000000041
>         
>         This dump was copied by hand from a smart phone screenshot, i
>         hope there
>         are no typos.
>         
>         It is not possible to write a demo program which reproduce
>         this bug due
>         the complexity, so i will explain what going on.
>         
>         First mount a kernel which include a initramfs doing the
>         following:
>         
>         /bin/mount -t proc none /proc
>         /bin/mount -o
>         rw,data=journal,barrier=1,errors=remount-ro /dev/sda3 /mnt
>         /bin/mount -o loop /mnt/rootfs.squashfs /rootfs
>         /bin/mount -o loop modules.squashfs /rootfs/lib/modules
>         /bin/mount -o move /mnt /rootfs/rw
>         /bin/umount /proc
>         exec /rootfs/bin/sh -c 'exec /sbin/switch_root
>         -c /dev/console /rootfs /sbin/init'
>         exec /bin/sh
>         
>         The Squashfs-Image will be mounted and will be the new root
>         filesystem,
>         the file system of /dev/sda3 will be then mounted under /rw.
>         
>         The reason to do this is, that is is very easy to exchange the
>         root
>         filesystem, since it it only a plain image file. And there is
>         no extra
>         partition necessary which can be to small in the future.
>         
>         Also the kernel modules will be a squashfs image as a part of
>         the
>         initramfs. This make it safe to exchange the kernel, because
>         it will
>         change togehter with the modules.
>         
>         After starting the new init process of the rootfs.squashfs the
>         firmware
>         image opfs.squashfs will be mounted also via loopback block
>         device
>         at /opt.
>         
>         When the user decide to do an update, a new rootfs.squashf
>         will be
>         copied into a ramdisk and the following script (snippet) will
>         be
>         executed:
>         
>         cat <<EOF >/tmp/init
>         #!/bin/sh
>         exec </dev/console
>         exec >/dev/console
>         exec 2>/dev/console
>         umount /init/opt
>         umount -l -r /init/rw
>         umount -l -r /init
>         umount /etc
>         rm -rf /tmp/etc
>         sync
>         for i in /dev/loop*
>         do
>                 losetup -d $i 2>/dev/null
>         done
>         rm \$0
>         exec /tmp/update.sh "$1" "$2"
>         reboot -f
>         EOF
>                 chmod a+x /tmp/init
>         
>                 echo "::restart:/tmp/init" >/tmp/etc/inittab
>         
>                 mount -o ro /dev/ramdisk /mnt
>                 cd /mnt
>                 /sbin/pivot_root . init
>         
>                 mount -o move /init/tmp /tmp
>                 mount -o move /init/proc /proc
>                 mount -o move /init/sys /sys
>                 mount -o move /init/dev/pts /dev/pts
>                 mount -o move /init/dev/shm /dev/shm
>                 mount -o bind /tmp/etc /etc
>         
>                 init -q
>                 sleep 1
>                 kill -SIGQUIT 1
>                 exit
>         
>         Now the update.sh script has the control over the system, no
>         more
>         application or daemons will running and all mass storages
>         should be
>         unmounted.
>         
>         Till this everything is working fine, than the update.sh will
>         execute
>         the following code:
>         
>         rm -f /rw/optfs.squashfs
>         
>         for i in /dev/loop*
>         do
>                 losetup -d $i 2>/dev/null
>         done
>         
>         This will remove the old firmware and all possible loopback
>         devices.
>         Executing the losetup will crash the kernel and will produce
>         the Oops
>         above.
>         
>         This is independent to the underlying file system or the
>         processor
>         architecture, it will happen on x86 or ppc and ext3fs and
>         yaffs2 as
>         well.
>         
>         Any idea?
> 
> 
> Here is proposed fix
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=136481752606623&w=2


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ