linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] cpufreq: AMD "frequency sensitivity feedback" powersave bias for ondemand governor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130402210124.GI17675@pd.tnic>
Date:	Tue, 2 Apr 2013 23:01:24 +0200
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
Cc:	Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@....com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] cpufreq: AMD "frequency sensitivity feedback"
 powersave bias for ondemand governor

On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 10:51:51PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> Yep, if you want anyone to make use of this, it should better get
> embedded in more general, at least general ondemand code.

Yeah, it all sounds like we want to enable this by default on systems
which support it. Maybe with an off-switch for people who want plain
ondemand decisions.

The remaining systems with ripped out powersave_bias would get plain
ondemand governor decisions. Provided, of course, nobody uses
powersave_bias and the functionality doesn't make any sense anyway.

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/