linux-kernel - [ 100/124] tcp: preserve ACK clocking in TSO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130402221115.717887239@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Tue,  2 Apr 2013 15:11:22 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>,
	Van Jacobson <vanj@...gle.com>,
	Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
	Nandita Dukkipati <nanditad@...gle.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [ 100/124] tcp: preserve ACK clocking in TSO

3.8-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------


From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>

[ Upstream commit f4541d60a449afd40448b06496dcd510f505928e ]

A long standing problem with TSO is the fact that tcp_tso_should_defer()
rearms the deferred timer, while it should not.

Current code leads to following bad bursty behavior :

20:11:24.484333 IP A > B: . 297161:316921(19760) ack 1 win 119
20:11:24.484337 IP B > A: . ack 263721 win 1117
20:11:24.485086 IP B > A: . ack 265241 win 1117
20:11:24.485925 IP B > A: . ack 266761 win 1117
20:11:24.486759 IP B > A: . ack 268281 win 1117
20:11:24.487594 IP B > A: . ack 269801 win 1117
20:11:24.488430 IP B > A: . ack 271321 win 1117
20:11:24.489267 IP B > A: . ack 272841 win 1117
20:11:24.490104 IP B > A: . ack 274361 win 1117
20:11:24.490939 IP B > A: . ack 275881 win 1117
20:11:24.491775 IP B > A: . ack 277401 win 1117
20:11:24.491784 IP A > B: . 316921:332881(15960) ack 1 win 119
20:11:24.492620 IP B > A: . ack 278921 win 1117
20:11:24.493448 IP B > A: . ack 280441 win 1117
20:11:24.494286 IP B > A: . ack 281961 win 1117
20:11:24.495122 IP B > A: . ack 283481 win 1117
20:11:24.495958 IP B > A: . ack 285001 win 1117
20:11:24.496791 IP B > A: . ack 286521 win 1117
20:11:24.497628 IP B > A: . ack 288041 win 1117
20:11:24.498459 IP B > A: . ack 289561 win 1117
20:11:24.499296 IP B > A: . ack 291081 win 1117
20:11:24.500133 IP B > A: . ack 292601 win 1117
20:11:24.500970 IP B > A: . ack 294121 win 1117
20:11:24.501388 IP B > A: . ack 295641 win 1117
20:11:24.501398 IP A > B: . 332881:351881(19000) ack 1 win 119

While the expected behavior is more like :

20:19:49.259620 IP A > B: . 197601:202161(4560) ack 1 win 119
20:19:49.260446 IP B > A: . ack 154281 win 1212
20:19:49.261282 IP B > A: . ack 155801 win 1212
20:19:49.262125 IP B > A: . ack 157321 win 1212
20:19:49.262136 IP A > B: . 202161:206721(4560) ack 1 win 119
20:19:49.262958 IP B > A: . ack 158841 win 1212
20:19:49.263795 IP B > A: . ack 160361 win 1212
20:19:49.264628 IP B > A: . ack 161881 win 1212
20:19:49.264637 IP A > B: . 206721:211281(4560) ack 1 win 119
20:19:49.265465 IP B > A: . ack 163401 win 1212
20:19:49.265886 IP B > A: . ack 164921 win 1212
20:19:49.266722 IP B > A: . ack 166441 win 1212
20:19:49.266732 IP A > B: . 211281:215841(4560) ack 1 win 119
20:19:49.267559 IP B > A: . ack 167961 win 1212
20:19:49.268394 IP B > A: . ack 169481 win 1212
20:19:49.269232 IP B > A: . ack 171001 win 1212
20:19:49.269241 IP A > B: . 215841:221161(5320) ack 1 win 119

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
Cc: Van Jacobson <vanj@...gle.com>
Cc: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Cc: Nandita Dukkipati <nanditad@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c |    7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
@@ -1809,8 +1809,11 @@ static bool tcp_tso_should_defer(struct
 			goto send_now;
 	}
 
-	/* Ok, it looks like it is advisable to defer.  */
-	tp->tso_deferred = 1 | (jiffies << 1);
+	/* Ok, it looks like it is advisable to defer.
+	 * Do not rearm the timer if already set to not break TCP ACK clocking.
+	 */
+	if (!tp->tso_deferred)
+		tp->tso_deferred = 1 | (jiffies << 1);
 
 	return true;
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/