lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130402224716.181018832@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Tue,  2 Apr 2013 15:50:04 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Andre Heider <a.heider@...il.com>,
	Lingzhu Xiang <lxiang@...hat.com>,
	Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@....com>,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
	CAI Qian <caiqian@...hat.com>
Subject: [ 37/56] efivars: Handle duplicate names from get_next_variable()

3.0-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>

commit e971318bbed610e28bb3fde9d548e6aaf0a6b02e upstream.

Some firmware exhibits a bug where the same VariableName and
VendorGuid values are returned on multiple invocations of
GetNextVariableName(). See,

    https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47631

As a consequence of such a bug, Andre reports hitting the following
WARN_ON() in the sysfs code after updating the BIOS on his, "Gigabyte
Technology Co., Ltd. To be filled by O.E.M./Z77X-UD3H, BIOS F19e
11/21/2012)" machine,

[    0.581554] EFI Variables Facility v0.08 2004-May-17
[    0.584914] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[    0.585639] WARNING: at /home/andre/linux/fs/sysfs/dir.c:536 sysfs_add_one+0xd4/0x100()
[    0.586381] Hardware name: To be filled by O.E.M.
[    0.587123] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/firmware/efi/vars/SbAslBufferPtrVar-01f33c25-764d-43ea-aeea-6b5a41f3f3e8'
[    0.588694] Modules linked in:
[    0.589484] Pid: 1, comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.8.0+ #7
[    0.590280] Call Trace:
[    0.591066]  [<ffffffff81208954>] ? sysfs_add_one+0xd4/0x100
[    0.591861]  [<ffffffff810587bf>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0
[    0.592650]  [<ffffffff810588bc>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4c/0x50
[    0.593429]  [<ffffffff8134dd85>] ? strlcat+0x65/0x80
[    0.594203]  [<ffffffff81208954>] sysfs_add_one+0xd4/0x100
[    0.594979]  [<ffffffff81208b78>] create_dir+0x78/0xd0
[    0.595753]  [<ffffffff81208ec6>] sysfs_create_dir+0x86/0xe0
[    0.596532]  [<ffffffff81347e4c>] kobject_add_internal+0x9c/0x220
[    0.597310]  [<ffffffff81348307>] kobject_init_and_add+0x67/0x90
[    0.598083]  [<ffffffff81584a71>] ? efivar_create_sysfs_entry+0x61/0x1c0
[    0.598859]  [<ffffffff81584b2b>] efivar_create_sysfs_entry+0x11b/0x1c0
[    0.599631]  [<ffffffff8158517e>] register_efivars+0xde/0x420
[    0.600395]  [<ffffffff81d430a7>] ? edd_init+0x2f5/0x2f5
[    0.601150]  [<ffffffff81d4315f>] efivars_init+0xb8/0x104
[    0.601903]  [<ffffffff8100215a>] do_one_initcall+0x12a/0x180
[    0.602659]  [<ffffffff81d05d80>] kernel_init_freeable+0x13e/0x1c6
[    0.603418]  [<ffffffff81d05586>] ? loglevel+0x31/0x31
[    0.604183]  [<ffffffff816a6530>] ? rest_init+0x80/0x80
[    0.604936]  [<ffffffff816a653e>] kernel_init+0xe/0xf0
[    0.605681]  [<ffffffff816ce7ec>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[    0.606414]  [<ffffffff816a6530>] ? rest_init+0x80/0x80
[    0.607143] ---[ end trace 1609741ab737eb29 ]---

There's not much we can do to work around and keep traversing the
variable list once we hit this firmware bug. Our only solution is to
terminate the loop because, as Lingzhu reports, some machines get
stuck when they encounter duplicate names,

  > I had an IBM System x3100 M4 and x3850 X5 on which kernel would
  > get stuck in infinite loop creating duplicate sysfs files because,
  > for some reason, there are several duplicate boot entries in nvram
  > getting GetNextVariableName into a circle of iteration (with
  > period > 2).

Also disable the workqueue, as efivar_update_sysfs_entries() uses
GetNextVariableName() to figure out which variables have been created
since the last iteration. That algorithm isn't going to work if
GetNextVariableName() returns duplicates. Note that we don't disable
EFI variable creation completely on the affected machines, it's just
that any pstore dump-* files won't appear in sysfs until the next
boot.

[Backported for 3.0-stable. Removed code related to pstore
workqueue but pulled in helper function variable_is_present
from a93bc0c; Moved the definition of __efivars to the top
for being referenced in variable_is_present.]

Reported-by: Andre Heider <a.heider@...il.com>
Reported-by: Lingzhu Xiang <lxiang@...hat.com>
Tested-by: Lingzhu Xiang <lxiang@...hat.com>
Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@....com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Lingzhu Xiang <lxiang@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: CAI Qian <caiqian@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>


---
 drivers/firmware/efivars.c |   65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/firmware/efivars.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/efivars.c
@@ -119,6 +119,8 @@ struct efivar_attribute {
 	ssize_t (*store)(struct efivar_entry *entry, const char *buf, size_t count);
 };
 
+static struct efivars __efivars;
+static struct efivar_operations ops;
 
 #define EFIVAR_ATTR(_name, _mode, _show, _store) \
 struct efivar_attribute efivar_attr_##_name = { \
@@ -730,6 +732,28 @@ static ssize_t efivar_delete(struct file
 	return count;
 }
 
+static bool variable_is_present(efi_char16_t *variable_name, efi_guid_t *vendor)
+{
+	struct efivar_entry *entry, *n;
+	struct efivars *efivars = &__efivars;
+	unsigned long strsize1, strsize2;
+	bool found = false;
+
+	strsize1 = utf16_strsize(variable_name, 1024);
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, n, &efivars->list, list) {
+		strsize2 = utf16_strsize(entry->var.VariableName, 1024);
+		if (strsize1 == strsize2 &&
+			!memcmp(variable_name, &(entry->var.VariableName),
+				strsize2) &&
+			!efi_guidcmp(entry->var.VendorGuid,
+				*vendor)) {
+			found = true;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+	return found;
+}
+
 /*
  * Returns the size of variable_name, in bytes, including the
  * terminating NULL character, or variable_name_size if no NULL
@@ -942,6 +966,28 @@ void unregister_efivars(struct efivars *
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unregister_efivars);
 
+/*
+ * Print a warning when duplicate EFI variables are encountered and
+ * disable the sysfs workqueue since the firmware is buggy.
+ */
+static void dup_variable_bug(efi_char16_t *s16, efi_guid_t *vendor_guid,
+			     unsigned long len16)
+{
+	size_t i, len8 = len16 / sizeof(efi_char16_t);
+	char *s8;
+
+	s8 = kzalloc(len8, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!s8)
+		return;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < len8; i++)
+		s8[i] = s16[i];
+
+	printk(KERN_WARNING "efivars: duplicate variable: %s-%pUl\n",
+	       s8, vendor_guid);
+	kfree(s8);
+}
+
 int register_efivars(struct efivars *efivars,
 		     const struct efivar_operations *ops,
 		     struct kobject *parent_kobj)
@@ -984,6 +1030,22 @@ int register_efivars(struct efivars *efi
 		case EFI_SUCCESS:
 			variable_name_size = var_name_strnsize(variable_name,
 							       variable_name_size);
+
+			/*
+			 * Some firmware implementations return the
+			 * same variable name on multiple calls to
+			 * get_next_variable(). Terminate the loop
+			 * immediately as there is no guarantee that
+			 * we'll ever see a different variable name,
+			 * and may end up looping here forever.
+			 */
+			if (variable_is_present(variable_name, &vendor_guid)) {
+				dup_variable_bug(variable_name, &vendor_guid,
+						 variable_name_size);
+				status = EFI_NOT_FOUND;
+				break;
+			}
+
 			efivar_create_sysfs_entry(efivars,
 						  variable_name_size,
 						  variable_name,
@@ -1010,9 +1072,6 @@ out:
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(register_efivars);
 
-static struct efivars __efivars;
-static struct efivar_operations ops;
-
 /*
  * For now we register the efi subsystem with the firmware subsystem
  * and the vars subsystem with the efi subsystem.  In the future, it


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ