[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130403091200.GA3909@balto.lan>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 11:12:00 +0200
From: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@...aro.org>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Praveena Nadahally <praveen.nadahally@...ricsson.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
Sakethram Bommisetti <sakethram.bommisetti@...ricsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] usb: phy: ab8500-usb: fix eye diagram for ab8500
v2.0
Hi Felipe,
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 11:58:58AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 11:53:36AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 10:45:05AM +0200, Fabio Baltieri wrote:
> > > From: Sakethram Bommisetti <sakethram.bommisetti@...ricsson.com>
> > >
> > > AB8500 v2.0 has eye diagram issues when drawing more than 100mA from
> > > VBUS. Force charging current to 100mA in case of standard host.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sakethram Bommisetti <sakethram.bommisetti@...ricsson.com>
> > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@...aro.org>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/usb/phy/phy-ab8500-usb.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/phy/phy-ab8500-usb.c b/drivers/usb/phy/phy-ab8500-usb.c
> > > index 5b92a59..1fd0780 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/usb/phy/phy-ab8500-usb.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/usb/phy/phy-ab8500-usb.c
> > > @@ -485,6 +485,18 @@ static void ab8500_usb_phy_disable_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > > ab8500_usb_peri_phy_dis(ab);
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static unsigned ab8500_eyediagram_workaroud(struct ab8500_usb *ab, unsigned mA)
> > > +{
> > > + /* AB8500 V2 has eye diagram issues when drawing more than 100mA from
> >
> > wrong comment style. Please run *all* patches through checkpatch.pl
> > --strict and sparse. I can wait 2 more hours before closing my tree for
> > v3.10.
>
> you know what ? this is simple enough, I'll fix it myself.
Ok, I was rushing a rebase but you've been faster! :-)
Anyway, paches were already sparse and checkpatch checked, but I ignored
a warning for "mA" camelcase (as that's how it's commonly spelled for
regulator) and new line indentation (where I used two-tabs instead of
open parenthesis to be coherent with the rest of the source).
For comment style, checkpatch does not give me any warning for some
reson. The in-line open style is already used in the net/ subsystem so
I was assuming that it was accepted here too. If this is not the case
maybe checkpatch.pl has to be fixed somehow.
Thanks,
Fabio
--
Fabio Baltieri
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists