linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 1/4] mm: Per process reclaim

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHO5Pa1we3FCoBTSHTO23tzCss4Z-AkZzoGxBYkTy7e5aYmcJw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 3 Apr 2013 12:12:42 +0200
From:	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
To:	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	Sangseok Lee <sangseok.lee@....com>,
	Michael Kerrisk-manpages <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/4] mm: Per process reclaim

> However, the interface is a quite blunt instrument. Would there be any
> virtue in extending it so that an address range could be written to

Here, I did mean to say "an *optional* address range.

Thanks,

Michael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/