linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] arm: introduce psci_smp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1304031218520.5078@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
Date:	Wed, 3 Apr 2013 12:29:31 +0100
From:	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
To:	Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
CC:	Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@...citrix.com>,
	"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"will.deacon@....com" <will.deacon@....com>,
	"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
	"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	"marc.zyngier@....com" <marc.zyngier@....com>,
	"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] arm: introduce psci_smp_ops

On Tue, 2 Apr 2013, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Apr 2013, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> 
> > Rename virt_smp_ops to psci_smp_ops and move them to arch/arm/kernel/psci_smp.c.
> > Remove mach-virt/platsmp.c, now unused.
> > Compile psci_smp if CONFIG_ARM_PSCI and CONFIG_SMP.
> > 
> > Add a cpu_die smp_op based on psci_ops.cpu_off.
> > 
> > Initialize PSCI before setting smp_ops in setup_arch.
> > Use psci_smp_ops if the platform doesn't provide its own smp_ops.
> 
> [...]
> 
> > @@ -766,9 +767,13 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
> >  	unflatten_device_tree();
> >  
> >  	arm_dt_init_cpu_maps();
> > +	psci_init();
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> >  	if (is_smp()) {
> > -		smp_set_ops(mdesc->smp);
> > +		if (mdesc->smp)
> > +			smp_set_ops(mdesc->smp);
> > +		else if (psci_smp_available())
> > +			smp_set_ops(&psci_smp_ops);
> 
> Didn't we agree to do this the other way around, i.e. 
> 
> 	if (psci_smp_available())
> 		smp_set_ops(&psci_smp_ops);
> 	else if (mdesc->smp)
> 		smp_set_ops(mdesc->smp);
> 
> ?

Yes, we agreed about it.
However that change was in a separate patch that I have dropped from
this version of the series, that is why it is missing.

I'll add back the change but I'll keep it in a separate patch to leave
the original one, now acked twice and reviewed once, untouched.


> This way you won't need the ->smp_init for Xen and that won't conflict 
> with MCPM.

See my other reply on the subject.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/