[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130403073857.78c2a24f@tlielax.poochiereds.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 07:38:57 -0400
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (nfsd
tree related)
On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 07:33:01 -0400
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 07:10:54AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 17:42:19 +1100
> > Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (arm defconfig)
> > > failed like this:
> > >
> > > fs/built-in.o: In function `nfsd_reply_cache_stats_show':
> > > super.c:(.text+0x87308): undefined reference to `__udivdi3'
> > >
> > > Probably caused by commit 187da2f90879 ("nfsd: keep track of the max and
> > > average time to search the cache") which adds a divide by u64
> > > (num_searches).
> > >
> > > I have reverted that commit and the following one for today.
> >
> > Thanks, known problem...
> >
> > Looks like Bruce's tree has an older version of that patch series. I
> > think we just need to get him to drop that one and merge the new one.
>
> Arrgh, sorry--could you remind me which is the new one?
>
It was the one I sent on 3/19. Those patches (plus a couple more) are
also in the current nfsd-3.10 branch of my git tree too, so it may be
easiest to just pick them from there.
Thanks,
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists