[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACQ1gAgHFpE3keS5_Wxwe4i2mTnnvT0VdwGJgVtW_6GCBmf1DA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 14:36:41 +0200
From: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] pinctrl: disable and free setting in select_state in
case of error
2013/4/3 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Richard Genoud
> <richard.genoud@...il.com> wrote:
>> 2013/3/28 Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>:
>
>>> Again, pinconf_free_setting() is all about freeing any dynamically
>>> allocated storage required to represent the setting itself; it's not
>>> about (un-)programming HW.
>>>
>> got it.
>> I'll change that
>
> I guess the incremental patches have fixed most issues pointed out
> in this thread? Elese keep the add-on patches coming, as long as the
> end result looks OK to both of you I'm happy too.
Yes, I think we've covered it all.
Tthe last patches are:
[PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: select_state: don't call pinctrl_free_setting on error
[PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: simplify the re-enable old state code in
pinctrl_select_state
(sent and reviewed on 29 march.)
Best regards,
Richard.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists