linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/7] memcg: don't use mem_cgroup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <515C2923.5020803@parallels.com>
Date:	Wed, 3 Apr 2013 17:05:39 +0400
From:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
To:	Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
CC:	<linux-mm@...ck.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/7] memcg: don't use mem_cgroup_get() when creating
 a kmemcg cache

On 04/03/2013 01:12 PM, Li Zefan wrote:
> Use css_get()/css_put() instead of mem_cgroup_get()/mem_cgroup_put().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
> ---
>  mm/memcontrol.c | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 43ca91d..dafacb8 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -3191,7 +3191,7 @@ void memcg_release_cache(struct kmem_cache *s)
>  	list_del(&s->memcg_params->list);
>  	mutex_unlock(&memcg->slab_caches_mutex);
>  
> -	mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
> +	css_put(&memcg->css);
>  out:
>  	kfree(s->memcg_params);
>  }
> @@ -3350,16 +3350,18 @@ static struct kmem_cache *memcg_create_kmem_cache(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&memcg_cache_mutex);
>  	new_cachep = cachep->memcg_params->memcg_caches[idx];
> -	if (new_cachep)
> +	if (new_cachep) {
> +		css_put(&memcg->css);
>  		goto out;
> +	}
>  
>  	new_cachep = kmem_cache_dup(memcg, cachep);
>  	if (new_cachep == NULL) {
>  		new_cachep = cachep;
> +		css_put(&memcg->css);
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> -	mem_cgroup_get(memcg);
>  	atomic_set(&new_cachep->memcg_params->nr_pages , 0);
>  
>  	cachep->memcg_params->memcg_caches[idx] = new_cachep;
> @@ -3449,8 +3451,6 @@ static void memcg_create_cache_work_func(struct work_struct *w)
>  
>  	cw = container_of(w, struct create_work, work);
>  	memcg_create_kmem_cache(cw->memcg, cw->cachep);
> -	/* Drop the reference gotten when we enqueued. */
> -	css_put(&cw->memcg->css);
>  	kfree(cw);
>  }
>  
> 
At first look, this one seems all right.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/