[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ75kXaZrA8bN+faNEJwFp_FDxtfSBk3nPvGZW_wYajFg6y1KQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 15:56:25 +0200
From: William Dauchy <wdauchy@...il.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
Cc: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>,
"roger.pau" <roger.pau@...rix.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
dgdegra <dgdegra@...ho.nsa.gov>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/block/xen-blkback: preq.dev is used without initialized
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com> wrote:
> ChangeLog-3.8.3 for example has
oh sorry, you are right. I wasn't looking is the 3.8.x branch.
The thing is, the revert seems present only in 3.8.x branch. For
example in 3.4.x the last patch is still 01c681d
Should we consider this normal or is it a mistake?
--
William
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists