[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87a9pfzm33.fsf@turtle.gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 17:10:40 +0200
From: Sven Joachim <svenjoac@....de>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [ 105/124] af_unix: dont send SCM_CREDENTIAL when dest socket is NULL
On 2013-04-03 16:00 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 13:41 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> On 2013-04-03 00:11 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>
>> > 3.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>>
>> I'm seeing several complaints from udevd at boot in both 3.8.6-rc1 and
>> 3.9-rc5: "udevd[56]: sender uid=65534, message ignored". Reverting the
>> patch below on top of 3.8.6-rc1 fixes that. I'm using udev version 175
>> here, and 65534 is the uid of user "nobody".
>
> And if you use a 3.1 kernel (before commit
> 16e5726269611b71c930054ffe9b858c1cea88eb) are you seeing this message ?
No (tested with 3.1.10).
> It might be a wrong sender (application bug or bad identity), and udevd
> correctly discards the incoming message.
How would I find out the culprit?
Cheers,
Sven
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists