linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/block/xen-blkback: preq.dev is used without initialized

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 3 Apr 2013 12:37:38 -0400
From:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To:	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
Cc:	William Dauchy <wdauchy@...il.com>,
	Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>,
	"roger.pau" <roger.pau@...rix.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
	xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
	dgdegra <dgdegra@...ho.nsa.gov>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/block/xen-blkback: preq.dev is used without
 initialized

On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 03:34:16PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 03.04.13 at 15:56, William Dauchy <wdauchy@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com> wrote:
> >> ChangeLog-3.8.3 for example has
> > 
> > oh sorry, you are right. I wasn't looking is the 3.8.x branch.
> > The thing is, the revert seems present only in 3.8.x branch. For
> > example in 3.4.x the last patch is still 01c681d
> > Should we consider this normal or is it a mistake?
> 
> I think it is a mistake, but ultimately it's Konrad's call.

It is a mistake. Please revert it if possible.
> 
> Jan
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/