[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130403170012.GY29151@sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 12:00:12 -0500
From: Robin Holt <holt@....com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Cc: Robin Holt <holt@....com>, Cliff Wickman <cpw@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org,
wli@...omorphy.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, x86: Do not zero hugetlbfs pages at boot. -v2
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 04:02:47PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 02-04-13 21:43:44, Robin Holt wrote:
> [...]
> > diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> > index ca9a7c6..7683f6a 100644
> > --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> > +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> > @@ -1185,7 +1185,7 @@ int __weak alloc_bootmem_huge_page(struct hstate *h)
> > while (nr_nodes) {
> > void *addr;
> >
> > - addr = __alloc_bootmem_node_nopanic(
> > + addr = __alloc_bootmem_node_nopanic_notzeroed(
> > NODE_DATA(hstate_next_node_to_alloc(h,
> > &node_states[N_MEMORY])),
> > huge_page_size(h), huge_page_size(h), 0);
>
> Ohh, and powerpc seems to have its own opinion how to allocate huge
> pages. See arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c
Do I need to address their allocations? Can I leave that part of the
changes as something powerpc can address if they are affected by this?
Robin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists