linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] perf: need to expose sched_clock to correlate user samples with kernel samples

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 03 Apr 2013 10:29:34 -0700
From:	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To:	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>
CC:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
	"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...il.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] perf: need to expose sched_clock to correlate user samples
 with kernel samples

On 04/03/2013 10:19 AM, Pawel Moll wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-04-02 at 17:19 +0100, John Stultz wrote:
>> But if we're going to have to do
>> this via a clockid, I'm going to want it to be done via a dynamic posix
>> clockid, so its clear its tightly tied with perf and not considered a
>> generic interface (and I can clearly point folks having problems to the
>> perf maintainers ;).
> Ok, so how about the code below?
>
> There are two distinct parts of the "solution":
>
> 1. The dynamic posix clock, as you suggested. Then one can get the perf
> timestamp by doing:
>
> 	clock_fd = open("/dev/perf-clock", O_RDONLY);
> 	clock_gettime(FD_TO_CLOCKID(clock_fd), &ts)
>
> 2. A sort-of-hack in the get_posix_clock() function making it possible
> to do the same using the perf event file descriptor, eg.:
>
> 	fd = sys_perf_event_open(&attr, -1, 0, -1, 0);
> 	clock_gettime(FD_TO_CLOCKID(fd), &ts)

#2 makes my nose wrinkle. Forgive me for being somewhat ignorant on the 
perf interfaces, but why is the second portion necessary or beneficial?

thanks
-john

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/