linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (nfsd tree related)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130403141643.1872e17e@tlielax.poochiereds.net>
Date:	Wed, 3 Apr 2013 14:16:43 -0400
From:	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
To:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (nfsd
 tree related)

On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 14:05:19 -0400
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 07:38:57AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 07:33:01 -0400
> > "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 07:10:54AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 17:42:19 +1100
> > > > Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > 
> > > > > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (arm defconfig)
> > > > > failed like this:
> > > > > 
> > > > > fs/built-in.o: In function `nfsd_reply_cache_stats_show':
> > > > > super.c:(.text+0x87308): undefined reference to `__udivdi3'
> > > > > 
> > > > > Probably caused by commit 187da2f90879 ("nfsd: keep track of the max and
> > > > > average time to search the cache") which adds a divide by u64
> > > > > (num_searches).
> > > > > 
> > > > > I have reverted that commit and the following one for today.
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks, known problem...
> > > > 
> > > > Looks like Bruce's tree has an older version of that patch series. I
> > > > think we just need to get him to drop that one and merge the new one.
> > > 
> > > Arrgh, sorry--could you remind me which is the new one?
> > > 
> > 
> > It was the one I sent on 3/19. Those patches (plus a couple more) are
> > also in the current nfsd-3.10 branch of my git tree too, so it may be
> > easiest to just pick them from there.
> 
> I hate rewriting that branch, but OK, done: does my for-3.10 look right
> to you now?
> 
> (It's still missing some of your latest patches.)
> 
> --b.

Yeah, sorry for that... I didn't find the problem with __udivdi3
until after I had asked you to merge the earlier set. Mea culpa...

Latest branch looks good. It would be good to get the later patches in
too, but those are less important than the DRC ones.

Thanks,
-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/