[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <515B9A7A.6030807@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 10:56:58 +0800
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
To: Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, arjan@...ux.intel.com, bp@...en8.de,
pjt@...gle.com, namhyung@...nel.org, efault@....de,
morten.rasmussen@....com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
len.brown@...el.com, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, jkosina@...e.cz,
clark.williams@...il.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
keescook@...omium.org, mgorman@...e.de, riel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [patch v3 0/8] sched: use runnable avg in load balance
On 04/03/2013 10:46 AM, Michael Wang wrote:
> | 15 GB | 16 | 45110 | | 48091 |
> | 15 GB | 24 | 41415 | | 47415 |
> | 15 GB | 32 | 35988 | | 45749 | +27.12%
>
> Very nice improvement, I'd like to test it with the wake-affine throttle
> patch later, let's see what will happen ;-)
>
> Any idea on why the last one caused the regression?
you can change the burst threshold: sysctl_sched_migration_cost, to see
what's happen with different value. create a similar knob and tune it.
+
+ if (cpu_rq(this_cpu)->avg_idle < sysctl_sched_migration_cost)
+ burst_this = 1;
+ if (cpu_rq(prev_cpu)->avg_idle < sysctl_sched_migration_cost)
+ burst_prev = 1;
+
BTW, what's the job thread behaviour of pgbench, guess it has lots of
wakeup. what's the work and sleep ratio of pgbench?
--
Thanks Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists