[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 12:45:57 +0300
From: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
CC: target-devel <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rdma <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org>,
Alexander Nezhinsky <alexandern@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC-v3 9/9] iser-target: Add iSCSI Extensions for RDMA (iSER)
target driver
On 04/04/2013 10:24, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> +#define ISER_RECV_DATA_SEG_LEN 8192
> +#define ISER_RX_PAYLOAD_SIZE (ISER_HEADERS_LEN + ISER_RECV_DATA_SEG_LEN)
> [...]
> +#define ISER_RX_PAD_SIZE (16384 - (ISER_RX_PAYLOAD_SIZE + \
> + sizeof(u64) + sizeof(struct ib_sge)))
We're eating here too much ram for the pad, you need 8K + something, so
the pad can count down
from 12K and not 16K which means each such element will consume three
pages and not four.
> +struct iser_rx_desc {
> + struct iser_hdr iser_header;
> + struct iscsi_hdr iscsi_header;
> + char data[ISER_RECV_DATA_SEG_LEN];
> + u64 dma_addr;
> + struct ib_sge rx_sg;
> + char pad[ISER_RX_PAD_SIZE];
> +} __packed;
> +
> +struct isert_rx_desc {
> + struct isert_conn *desc_conn;
> + struct work_struct desc_work;
> + struct iser_rx_desc desc;
> +} __packed;
You have way enough room in the pad field of struct iser_rx_desc to
place there the two fields
added by struct isert_rx_desc (and you only use struct iser_rx_desc from
within isert_rx_desc) --> any reason
not to unify them?
Or.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists