| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 15:27:34 +0200 (CEST) From: Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com> To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu> cc: Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the ext4 tree On Thu, 4 Apr 2013, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 09:20:48 -0400 > From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> > To: Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com> > Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org, > linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org > Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the ext4 tree > > On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 03:18:32PM +0200, Lukáš Czerner wrote: > > I am afraid I do not understand why this is happening. The commit > > simply replaces ext4_get_group_no_and_offset() with > > ext4_get_group_number() which has the similar definition in the same > > header file. Maybe someone knows what this is all about ? > > I've fixed this up already in the ext4 tree. The problem is that you > defined the function ext4_get_group_number() as "inline", but the > function body was only in fs/ext4/balloc.c. I have no idea why gcc > wasn't complaining about this on x86, but the fix was to simply > declare the function as "extern", not as "inline". > > - Ted > Ok, that's why I have not seen it in ext4 tree :). I do not know why I did it, but it was obviously wrong. Thanks for fixing it. -Lukas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists