[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 08:22:13 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/7] cgroup: make sure parent won't be destroyed
before its children
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 05:20:28PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > But what harm does an additional reference do?
>
> No harm at all. I just wanted to be sure that this is not yet another
> "for memcg" hack. So if this is useful for other controllers then I have
> no objections of course.
I think it makes sense in general, so let's do it in cgroup core. I
suppose it'd be easier for this to be routed together with other memcg
changes?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists