lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 5 Apr 2013 00:50:02 +0800
From:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Jason Garrett-Glaser <jason@...4.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	dingtianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>,
	Karel Srot <ksrot@...hat.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: Word-at-a-time dcache name accesses (was Re: .. anybody know of
 any filesystems that depend on the exact VFS 'namehash' implementation?)

[resend in plain text mode (I did not notice the gmail changed the
default mode, sorry)]

On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Hi, ALL
>
> I also encountered the same problem.
>
> git bisect:
>
> 14134f6584212d585b310ce95428014b653dfaf6 is the first bad commit
> commit 14134f6584212d585b310ce95428014b653dfaf6
> Author: dingtianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
> Date:   Mon Mar 25 17:02:04 2013 +0000
>
>     af_unix: dont send SCM_CREDENTIAL when dest socket is NULL
>
>     SCM_SCREDENTIALS should apply to write() syscalls only either source or
> destination
>     socket asserted SOCK_PASSCRED. The original implememtation in
> maybe_add_creds is wrong,
>     and breaks several LSB testcases ( i.e.
> /tset/LSB.os/netowkr/recvfrom/T.recvfrom).
>
>     Origionally-authored-by: Karel Srot <ksrot@...hat.com>
>     Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
>     Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>     Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>
> :040000 040000 ef0356cc0fc168a39c0f94cff0ba27c46c4d0048
> ae34e59f235c379f04d6145f0103cccd5b3a307a M net
>
> ===========
> Like Brian Gerst, no obvious bug, but the system can't boot, "service udev
> start" fails when boot
> (also DEBUG_PAGEALLOC=n, I did not try to test with it=y)
>
> [   11.022976] systemd[1]: udev-control.socket failed to listen on sockets:
> Address already in use
> [   11.023293] systemd[1]: Unit udev-control.socket entered failed state.
> [   11.182478] systemd-readahead-replay[399]: Bumped block_nr parameter of
> 8:16 to 16384. This is a temporary hack and should be removed one day.
> [   14.473283] udevd[410]: bind failed: Address already in use
> [   14.478630] udevd[410]: error binding udev control socket
> [   15.201158] systemd[1]: udev.service: main process exited, code=exited,
> status=1
> [   16.900792] udevd[427]: error binding udev control socket
> [   18.356484] EXT4-fs (sdb7): re-mounted. Opts: (null)
> [   19.738401] systemd[1]: udev.service holdoff time over, scheduling
> restart.
> [   19.742494] systemd[1]: Job pending for unit, delaying automatic restart.
> [   19.747764] systemd[1]: Unit udev.service entered failed state.
> [   19.752303] systemd[1]: udev-control.socket failed to listen on sockets:
> Address already in use
> [   19.770723] udevd[459]: bind failed: Address already in use
> [   19.771027] udevd[459]: error binding udev control socket
> [   19.771175] udevd[459]: error binding udev control socket
> [   19.813256] systemd[1]: udev.service: main process exited, code=exited,
> status=1
> [   19.914450] systemd[1]: udev.service holdoff time over, scheduling
> restart.
> [   19.918374] systemd[1]: Job pending for unit, delaying automatic restart.
> [   19.923392] systemd[1]: Unit udev.service entered failed state.
> [   19.923808] systemd[1]: udev-control.socket failed to listen on sockets:
> Address already in use
> [   19.943792] udevd[465]: bind failed: Address already in use
> [   19.944056] udevd[465]: error binding udev control socket
> [   19.944210] udevd[465]: error binding udev control socket
> [   19.946071] systemd[1]: udev.service: main process exited, code=exited,
> status=1
> [   20.047524] systemd[1]: udev.service holdoff time over, scheduling
> restart.
> [   20.051939] systemd[1]: Job pending for unit, delaying automatic restart.
> [   20.057539] systemd[1]: Unit udev.service entered failed state.
> [   20.058069] systemd[1]: udev-control.socket failed to listen on sockets:
> Address already in use
> [   20.081141] udevd[467]: bind failed: Address already in use
> [   20.087120] udevd[467]: error binding udev control socket
> [   20.092040] udevd[467]: error binding udev control socket
> [   20.096519] systemd[1]: udev.service: main process exited, code=exited,
> status=1
> [   20.184910] systemd[1]: udev.service holdoff time over, scheduling
> restart.
> [   20.189863] systemd[1]: Job pending for unit, delaying automatic restart.
> [   20.195440] systemd[1]: Unit udev.service entered failed state.
> [   20.196012] systemd[1]: udev-control.socket failed to listen on sockets:
> Address already in use
> [   20.220543] udevd[469]: bind failed: Address already in use
> [   20.220584] udevd[469]: error binding udev control socket
> [   20.220780] udevd[469]: error binding udev control socket
> [   20.222830] systemd[1]: udev.service: main process exited, code=exited,
> status=1
> [   20.323906] systemd[1]: udev.service holdoff time over, scheduling
> restart.
> [   20.329170] systemd[1]: Job pending for unit, delaying automatic restart.
> [   20.334785] systemd[1]: Unit udev.service entered failed state.
> [   20.335318] systemd[1]: udev-control.socket failed to listen on sockets:
> Address already in use
> [   20.360255] udevd[471]: bind failed: Address already in use
> [   20.360294] udevd[471]: error binding udev control socket
> [   20.360401] udevd[471]: error binding udev control socket
> [   20.362359] systemd[1]: udev.service: main process exited, code=exited,
> status=1
> [   20.463651] systemd[1]: udev.service holdoff time over, scheduling
> restart.
> [   20.468380] systemd[1]: Job pending for unit, delaying automatic restart.
> [   20.473938] systemd[1]: Unit udev.service entered failed state.
> [   20.474309] systemd[1]: udev-control.socket failed to listen on sockets:
> Address already in use
> [   20.488704] systemd[1]: udev.service start request repeated too quickly,
> refusing to start.
> [   20.504820] systemd[1]: udev-control.socket failed to listen on sockets:
> Address already in use
> [   20.510091] systemd[1]: udev.service start request repeated too quickly,
> refusing to start.
> [   20.511575] systemd[1]: Unit udev-kernel.socket entered failed state.
>
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Linus Torvalds
>> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Yes, I see that commit.  It looks like I have a different bug that is
>> >> preventing the current head from booting then.  Bisecting brought me
>> >> to this commit instead.
>> >
>> > So try first just forcing DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS off (easily done by just
>> > removing the "select" line in arch/x86/Kconfig).
>> >
>> > If that fixes things, it really is the word access code.
>> >
>> > But if the problem persists and it's a different bug, try to bisect it
>> > with that DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS config option always forced off, just to
>> > avoid any mixing of issues, exactly because we did have that one bug
>> > that already got fixed that looked somewhat similar..
>> >
>> > I'll test the current -git kernel on a F16 machine I have, just to
>> > check. But I'm also assuming that there is something specific about
>> > your setup, because otherwise I'd have expected many  more reports
>> > about this...
>> >
>> >                     Linus
>>
>> Commit f132c5be05e40 did fix this particular problem for me.  There is
>> another bug causing boot failure (seems to be in the DRM code), but
>> bisecting initially fingered this patch.  It was just looking at
>> kernels in between this patch and the later fix.  Sorry for the
>> confusion.
>>
>> --
>> Brian Gerst
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ