[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 21:23:23 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@....com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] cpufreq: AMD "frequency sensitivity feedback"
powersave bias for ondemand governor
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 11:19:04AM -0500, Jacob Shin wrote:
> Future AMD processors, starting with Family 16h, can provide software
> with feedback on how the workload may respond to frequency change --
> memory-bound workloads will not benefit from higher frequency, where
> as compute-bound workloads will. This patch enables this "frequency
> sensitivity feedback" to aid the ondemand governor to make better
> frequency change decisions by hooking into the powersave bias.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@....com>
Looks good to me.
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists