[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAErSpo6rmxMrX8EWiaut3wLSCu7LvmstyadEnTRu4Bv5MVyXJw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 16:00:30 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/27] PCI: Add pci_dev_resource_idx() helper
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
> Use resource pointer to get index in pci resources array/list.
>
> -v2: export symbol for acpiphp compiling error, found by
> Steven Newbury <steve@...wbury.org.uk>
>
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
> ---
> drivers/pci/probe.c | 9 +++++++++
> include/linux/pci.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> index 9cb3eb3..1df75f7 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -114,6 +114,15 @@ struct resource *pci_dev_resource_n(struct pci_dev *dev, int n)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_dev_resource_n);
>
> +int pci_dev_resource_idx(struct pci_dev *dev, struct resource *res)
> +{
> + if (res >= dev->resource &&
> + res <= dev->resource + (PCI_NUM_RESOURCES - 1))
> + return res - dev->resource;
> +
> + return -1;
> +}
I'm dubious about the whole idea of a resource *index*. I'd like to
get away from that concept completely.
Some uses of this are just for printing and are obviously unnecessary
(get_res_add_size()).
Other places we pass around the index, e.g.,
reassign_resources_sorted() passes it to pci_assign_resource() and
pci_reassign_resource(), and eventually we just pass the index to
pci_dev_resource_n() to get back what we started with. I'd rather
just pass around a pointer instead of this half pointer/half index
strategy.
We might need a "struct pci_resource" or something that contains the
type (BAR, IOV, bridge window, etc), a BAR number, etc. There's
already a "struct pci_resource" in cpqphp, but that's isolated to
cpqphp and could be easily changed if you wanted that name.
It's going to be very confusing to have a "struct pci_dev_resource"
and a "pci_dev_resource_n()" that have nothing to do with each other.
> static u64 pci_size(u64 base, u64 maxbase, u64 mask)
> {
> u64 size = mask & maxbase; /* Find the significant bits */
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> index 00d5367..aefff8b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -339,6 +339,7 @@ struct pci_dev {
> };
>
> struct resource *pci_dev_resource_n(struct pci_dev *dev, int n);
> +int pci_dev_resource_idx(struct pci_dev *dev, struct resource *res);
>
> static inline struct pci_dev *pci_physfn(struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists