linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] extend hugepage migration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <515E2592.7020607@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 05 Apr 2013 09:14:58 +0800
From:	Simon Jeons <simon.jeons@...il.com>
To:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
CC:	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Linux kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] extend hugepage migration

Hi Michal,
On 03/22/2013 04:15 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [getting off-list]
>
> On Fri 22-03-13 07:46:32, Simon Jeons wrote:
>> Hi Michal,
>> On 03/21/2013 08:56 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> On Thu 21-03-13 07:49:48, Simon Jeons wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>> When I hacking arch/x86/mm/hugetlbpage.c like this,
>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/hugetlbpage.c b/arch/x86/mm/hugetlbpage.c
>>>> index ae1aa71..87f34ee 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/x86/mm/hugetlbpage.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/hugetlbpage.c
>>>> @@ -354,14 +354,13 @@ hugetlb_get_unmapped_area(struct file *file,
>>>> unsigned long addr,
>>>>
>>>> #endif /*HAVE_ARCH_HUGETLB_UNMAPPED_AREA*/
>>>>
>>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>>>> static __init int setup_hugepagesz(char *opt)
>>>> {
>>>> unsigned long ps = memparse(opt, &opt);
>>>> if (ps == PMD_SIZE) {
>>>> hugetlb_add_hstate(PMD_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT);
>>>> - } else if (ps == PUD_SIZE && cpu_has_gbpages) {
>>>> - hugetlb_add_hstate(PUD_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT);
>>>> + } else if (ps == PUD_SIZE) {
>>>> + hugetlb_add_hstate(PMD_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT+4);
>>>> } else {
>>>> printk(KERN_ERR "hugepagesz: Unsupported page size %lu M\n",
>>>> ps >> 20);
>>>>
>>>> I set boot=hugepagesz=1G hugepages=10, then I got 10 32MB huge pages.
>>>> What's the difference between these pages which I hacking and normal
>>>> huge pages?
>>> How is this related to the patch set?
>>> Please _stop_ distracting discussion to unrelated topics!
>>>
>>> Nothing personal but this is just wasting our time.
>> Sorry kindly Michal, my bad.
>> Btw, could you explain this question for me? very sorry waste your time.
> Your CPU has to support GB pages. You have removed cpu_has_gbpages test
> and added a hstate for order 13 pages which is a weird number on its
> own (32MB) because there is no page table level to support them.

But after hacking, there is /sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/hugepages-*, and 
have equal number of 32MB huge pages which I set up in boot parameter. 
If there is no page table level to support them, how can them present? I 
can hacking this successfully in ubuntu, but not in fedora.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/