linux-kernel - Re: Version number policy!

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 5 Apr 2013 01:19:00 -0700
From:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...not-panic.com>
To:	Adrian Chadd <adrian@...ebsd.org>
Cc:	ath9k_htc_fw <ath9k_htc_fw@...ts.infradead.org>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-bluetooth <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
	Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@...glemail.com>
Subject: Re: Version number policy!

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Adrian Chadd <adrian@...ebsd.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here's my first take on the version number policy:
>
> https://github.com/qca/open-ath9k-htc-firmware/wiki/VersionPolicy
>
> The summary:
>
> * major version number changes are for firmware API / behaviour
> changes that aren't backwards compatible;
> * minor version number changes are for firmware API / behaviour
> changes that are incremental and default to the old behaviour (eg, new
> optional commands);
> * the driver should check the minor version number before using any
> optional features with that version.
>
> What's TODO:
>
> * Add a new WMI command to get the build number, git string, etc.
> * add it as our first optional minor version command :-)

This is better than anything we had drafted before for 802.11 open
firmware design rules. Cc'ing a few lists for wider review given that
what we had written before for rules was for 802.11 and Bluetooth [0]
and it was very Linux specific. We are striving for open firmware here
for the community, for BSD / Linux. Christian would have dealt with
more of the support on open firmware design so far due to carl9170.fw
[1] so curious if he has any input.

As for 802.11 the rules we defined were pretty silly about firmware
file names but should be considered. Here's the key thing I think we
should keep from those old guidelines:

"In general if you are just providing bug fixes you do not need to
provide a new firmware filename for the module, using the old filename
is fine so long as the same API was kept."

The rest I think your specification details better what we should do
in terms of API changes for versioning.

[0] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/developers/Documentation/firmware-versioning
[1] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/carl9170.fw

  Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/