linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4 0/2] cpufreq: ondemand: add AMD specific powersave bias

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2396755.WnKv3T7qE3@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Fri, 05 Apr 2013 13:55:11 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 0/2] cpufreq: ondemand: add AMD specific powersave bias

On Friday, April 05, 2013 12:19:36 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 5 April 2013 10:19, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> > For the latest versions sent by you (including {get|put}_online_cpus()):
> >
> > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> 
> Hi Rafael,
> 
> I see that you have applied this patchset to bleeding-edge, but in
> wrong order. You have applied 2/2 first and then 1/2, which is
> wrong as after 2/2 we will have a compilation failure.

Ah, good catch.  I didn't notice that patchwork changed the ordering when
creating a bundle.

Should be fixed now.

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/