[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201304051409.37708.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 14:09:37 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
John Linn <John.Linn@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the xilinx tree
On Friday 05 April 2013, Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2013/4/5 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> > arch/arm/mach-spear/spear13xx.c between commit c79e33b3e828 ("ARM:
> > smp_twd: convert to use CLKSRC_OF init") from the xilinx tree and commit
> > 2b9c613c4ee1 ("ARM: spear: move generic.h and pl080.h into private dir")
> > from the arm-soc tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (just used the arm-soc tree version) and can carry the fix
> > as necessary (no action is required).
> > <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
>
>
> Interesting. I rebased my arm-next branch based on 3.9-rc5
> with some Rob's + one Arnd patch from arm-soc - clksrc/cleanup branch.
>
> I will fix my arm-next branch.
The for-next branch in arm-soc is not stable, you should never base
/anything/ on it. If you depend on some stable branch, that is in arm-soc,
then use just that branch, not one of the next/* branches or for-next.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists