linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 2/2] initramfs with digital signature protection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 5 Apr 2013 09:50:00 -0400
From:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To:	"Kasatkin, Dmitry" <dmitry.kasatkin@...el.com>
Cc:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] initramfs with digital signature protection

On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 11:55:09PM +0200, Kasatkin, Dmitry wrote:

[..]
> > Also I am assuming that from signed initramfs, keys will be loaded in
> > appropriate keyrings and then keyring will be locked so that any
> > tools from unsigned initramfs can not load additional keys.
> >
> 
> Exactly like that.

Dmitry,

[ Following up on this thread after a very long time ]

I was thinking about this point that keys can be loaded from signed
initramfs. But how is it better than embedding the keys in kernel the
way we do for module signing and lock down ima keyring before control
is passed to initramfs.

Reason being, that anyway a user can not put its own keys in signed
initramfs. Signed initramfs will be shipped by distribution. So then
it does not matter whether distribution's keys are embedded in the
kernel or are loaded from signed initramfs.

Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/