[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1365179211.4530.9.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 18:26:51 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hhuang@...hat.com, jason.low2@...com,
walken@...gle.com, lwoodman@...hat.com, chegu_vinod@...com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm -next] ipc,sem: untangle RCU locking with
find_alloc_undo
On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 09:21 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On 04/05/2013 12:38 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 16:00 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> >> The ipc semaphore code has a nasty RCU locking tangle, with both
> >> find_alloc_undo and semtimedop taking the rcu_read_lock(). The
> >> code can be cleaned up somewhat by only taking the rcu_read_lock
> >> once.
> >>
> >> There are no other callers to find_alloc_undo.
> >>
> >> This should also solve the trinity issue reported by Sasha Levin.
> >
> > I take it this is on top of the patchlet Sasha submitted?
>
> Indeed, and all the other fixes that got submitted :)
>
> > (I hit rcu stall banging on patch set in rt with 60 synchronized core
> > executive model if I let it run long enough, fwtw)
>
> What are you using to trigger an rcu stall?
Running a model of a userspace task scheduler. That was a fix or so ago
now though. I'll try the set again on that box.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists