linux-kernel - Re: GFS2: Pull request (fixes)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFzPK1Sz_JO4iDvKSnPXdin8CBET7eisYFkMV8DctLfTZg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 5 Apr 2013 09:53:54 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	David Teigland <teigland@...hat.com>
Cc:	Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	cluster-devel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: GFS2: Pull request (fixes)

On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 9:27 AM, David Teigland <teigland@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 11:34:45AM +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
>> Please consider pulling the following changes,
>
> There's some mixup here that should be cleared up first.
>
>> David Teigland (2):
>>       GFS2: Fix unlock of fcntl locks during withdrawn state
>>
>> Steven Whitehouse (1):
>>       GFS2: Fix unlock of fcntl locks during withdrawn state

Looks like the summary line for one got leaked through an email
follow-up to the other. So now the summary of the second commit is
meaningless and doesn't actually describe it.

               Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/