[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <515F42EE.8060203@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 17:32:30 -0400
From: "Michael R. Hines" <mrhines@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org>
CC: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...lanox.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, qemu-devel@...gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] rdma: add a new IB_ACCESS_GIFT flag
Well, I have the "is_dup_page()" commented out.......when RDMA is
activated.....
Is there something else in QEMU that could be touching the page that I
don't know about?
- Michael
On 04/05/2013 05:03 PM, Roland Dreier wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Michael R. Hines
> <mrhines@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> Sorry, I was wrong. ignore the comments about cgroups. That's still broken.
>> (i.e. trying to register RDMA memory while using a cgroup swap limit cause
>> the process get killed).
>>
>> But the GIFT flag patch works (my understanding is that GIFT flag allows the
>> adapter to transmit stale memory information, it does not have anything to
>> do with cgroups specifically).
> The point of the GIFT patch is to avoid triggering copy-on-write so
> that memory doesn't blow up during migration. If that doesn't work
> then there's no point to the patch.
>
> - R.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists