[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQW9LsXo7gRvpAUv2ORbe2iuZaYO9nNOP-vTWa-_P450tg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 15:16:48 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>,
Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
linux-acpi <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 17/22] x86, ACPI, numa, ia64: split SLIT handling out
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
>> It should not break ia64 by replacing acpi_numa_init with
>> acpi_numa_init_srat/acpi_numa_init_slit/acpi_num_arch_fixup.
>
> You are right - it doesn't break ia64. All my test configs still
> build. Machines both with and without NUMA still boot and
> nothing strange happens.
>
> Tested-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Great, Thanks a lot for testing them.
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists