linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/2] scm: Stop passing struct cred

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130405.004754.281478419999797757.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:47:54 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	ebiederm@...ssion.com
Cc:	svenjoac@....de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dingtianhong@...wei.com,
	edumazet@...gle.com, luto@...capital.net, ksrot@...hat.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/2] scm: Stop passing struct cred

From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 20:28:16 -0700

> 
> Now that uids and gids are completely encapsulated in kuid_t
> and kgid_t we no longer need to pass struct cred which allowed
> us to test both the uid and the user namespace for equality.
> 
> Passing struct cred potentially allows us to pass the entire group
> list as BSD does but I don't believe the cost of cache line misses
> justifies retaining code for a future potential application.
> 
> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>

I'll apply this to net-next once #1 and #2 propagate there.

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/