lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1365256509-29024-12-git-send-email-jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Date:	Sat,  6 Apr 2013 21:55:05 +0800
From:	Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
	Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@...wei.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4, part3 11/15] mm: use a dedicated lock to protect totalram_pages and zone->managed_pages

Currently lock_memory_hotplug()/unlock_memory_hotplug() are used to
protect totalram_pages and zone->managed_pages. Other than the memory
hotplug driver, totalram_pages and zone->managed_pages may also be
modified at runtime by other drivers, such as Xen balloon,
virtio_balloon etc. For those cases, memory hotplug lock is a little
too heavy, so introduce a dedicated lock to protect totalram_pages
and zone->managed_pages.

Now we have a simplified locking rules totalram_pages and
zone->managed_pages as:
1) no locking for read accesses because they are unsigned long.
2) no locking for write accesses at boot time in single-threaded context.
3) serialize write accesses at runtime by acquiring the dedicated
   managed_page_count_lock.

Also adjust zone->managed_pages when freeing reserved pages into the
buddy system, to keep totalram_pages and zone->managed_pages in
consistence.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org (open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT)
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
---
 include/linux/mm.h     |    6 ++----
 include/linux/mmzone.h |   14 ++++++++++----
 mm/page_alloc.c        |   19 +++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index 1f03b0e..da3ffb0 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -1301,6 +1301,7 @@ extern void free_initmem(void);
  */
 extern unsigned long free_reserved_area(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
 					int poison, char *s);
+
 #ifdef	CONFIG_HIGHMEM
 /*
  * Free a highmem page into the buddy system, adjusting totalhigh_pages
@@ -1309,10 +1310,7 @@ extern unsigned long free_reserved_area(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
 extern void free_highmem_page(struct page *page);
 #endif
 
-static inline void adjust_managed_page_count(struct page *page, long count)
-{
-	totalram_pages += count;
-}
+extern void adjust_managed_page_count(struct page *page, long count);
 
 /* Free the reserved page into the buddy system, so it gets managed. */
 static inline void __free_reserved_page(struct page *page)
diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
index 72e1cb5..dc9c6ca 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
@@ -474,10 +474,16 @@ struct zone {
 	 * frequently read in proximity to zone->lock.  It's good to
 	 * give them a chance of being in the same cacheline.
 	 *
-	 * Write access to present_pages and managed_pages at runtime should
-	 * be protected by lock_memory_hotplug()/unlock_memory_hotplug().
-	 * Any reader who can't tolerant drift of present_pages and
-	 * managed_pages should hold memory hotplug lock to get a stable value.
+	 * Write access to present_pages at runtime should be protected by
+	 * lock_memory_hotplug()/unlock_memory_hotplug().  Any reader who can't
+	 * tolerant drift of present_pages should hold memory hotplug lock to
+	 * get a stable value.
+	 *
+	 * Read access to managed_pages should be safe because it's unsigned
+	 * long. Write access to zone->managed_pages and totalram_pages are
+	 * protected by managed_page_count_lock at runtime. Idealy only
+	 * adjust_managed_page_count() should be used instead of directly
+	 * touching zone->managed_pages and totalram_pages.
 	 */
 	unsigned long		spanned_pages;
 	unsigned long		present_pages;
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 45be58c..ca1a6ce 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -100,6 +100,9 @@ nodemask_t node_states[NR_NODE_STATES] __read_mostly = {
 };
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(node_states);
 
+/* Protect totalram_pages and zone->managed_pages */
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(managed_page_count_lock);
+
 unsigned long totalram_pages __read_mostly;
 unsigned long totalreserve_pages __read_mostly;
 /*
@@ -5186,6 +5189,22 @@ early_param("movablecore", cmdline_parse_movablecore);
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP */
 
+void adjust_managed_page_count(struct page *page, long count)
+{
+	bool lock = (system_state != SYSTEM_BOOTING);
+
+	/* No need to acquire the lock during boot */
+	if (lock)
+		spin_lock(&managed_page_count_lock);
+
+	page_zone(page)->managed_pages += count;
+	totalram_pages += count;
+
+	if (lock)
+		spin_unlock(&managed_page_count_lock);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(adjust_managed_page_count);
+
 unsigned long free_reserved_area(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
 				 int poison, char *s)
 {
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ