linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] fsfreeze: manage kill signal when sb_start

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51603877.7070904@gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 06 Apr 2013 17:00:07 +0200
From:	Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@...il.com>
To:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
CC:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...ionio.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
	Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@...sung.com>,
	Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>,
	KONISHI Ryusuke <konishi.ryusuke@....ntt.co.jp>,
	Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com>,
	Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
	Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
	linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	cluster-devel@...hat.com, linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org,
	ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] fsfreeze: manage kill signal when sb_start_pagefault
 is called

Il 06/04/2013 15:20, Matthew Wilcox ha scritto:
> On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 12:05:52PM +0200, Marco Stornelli wrote:
>> In every place where sb_start_pagefault was called now we must manage
>> the error code and return VM_FAULT_RETRY.
>
> Erm ... in patch 1/4:
>
>   static inline void sb_start_pagefault(struct super_block *sb)
>   {
> -       __sb_start_write(sb, SB_FREEZE_PAGEFAULT, true);
> +       __sb_start_write_wait(sb, SB_FREEZE_PAGEFAULT, false);
>   }
>
>>
>> -	sb_start_pagefault(inode->i_sb);
>> +	ret = sb_start_pagefault(inode->i_sb);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return VM_FAULT_RETRY;
>>   	ret  = btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space(inode, PAGE_CACHE_SIZE);
>
> Does the compiler not warn that you're assigning void to 'ret'?  Or was
> there some other SNAFU sending these patches?
>

I'm sorry, my fault :) As I said in 00 these patches are completely 
*not* tested, it was only a "quick coding & review" to understand if 
someone can see any problem to this kind of implementation, since I 
touched several points in the kernel. So there is still on-going work 
and I need to do several tests. Maybe I had to add the RFC tag, sorry again.

Marco
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/