[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130406104053.GA24710@yoda.lan>
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2013 12:40:53 +0200
From: Philip Kranz <philip.kranz@...glemail.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Sebastian Wankerl <sisewank@....cs.fau.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Philip Kranz <philip.kranz@...glemail.com>,
i4passt@...ts.informatik.uni-erlangen.de,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add non-zero module sections to sysfs
Hello.
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 12:07:15PM +0200, James Bottomley wrote:
> Just so you know: this isn't a parisc specific problem. Gcc produces
> duplicate section names under various circumstances, but the one that
> bites us is -ffunction-sections. Note that there are proposals to use
> -ffunction-sections on all architectures (so we can garbage collect
> unused functions) in which case you'll induce the bug identified in
> 35dead4235e2b67da7275b4122fed37099c2f462 on every architecture
I am not able to produce an object file with duplicate section names
using gcc on x86. Even with -ffunction-sections, every section gets a
unique name. Is this architecture-specific behaviour of gcc?
Greetings,
Philip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists