| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2013 15:24:56 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Daniel Tang <dt.tangr@...il.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux@....linux.org.uk,
fabian@...ter-vogt.de, Lionel Debroux <lionel_debroux@...oo.fr>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH arm: initial TI-Nspire support]
On Saturday 06 April 2013, Daniel Tang wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 06/04/2013, at 10:51 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> >
> > Ok, whichever way you prefer. If you have questions while working on this,
> > feel free to join #armlinux on irc.freenode.net, there are usually other
> > people working on the same things.
> >
>
> Cheers.
>
> We already have something basic that boots successfully using device trees.
>
> Some comments before we continue would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Tang <dt.tangr@...il.com>
Wow, that was quick!
The patch looks great overall, I just found a few details and have some comments
that you might find helpful.
> arch/arm/Kconfig | 13 ++
> arch/arm/Makefile | 3 +-
> arch/arm/boot/dts/nspire-cx.dts | 85 +++++++++++++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/nspire.dtsi | 154 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/mach-nspire/Makefile | 3 +
> arch/arm/mach-nspire/include/mach/debug-macro.S | 25 ++++
> arch/arm/mach-nspire/include/mach/timex.h | 15 +++
> arch/arm/mach-nspire/include/mach/uncompress.h | 25 ++++
> arch/arm/mach-nspire/mmio.h | 13 ++
> arch/arm/mach-nspire/nspire.c | 107 ++++++++++++++++
A good next step before doing anything else might be to put it under
CONFIG_ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM and remove the include/mach directory.
The only requirement for that should be to move debug-macro.S to
include/debug/nspire.S
> +config ARCH_NSPIRE
> + bool "TI-NSPIRE based"
> + depends on MMU
> + select CPU_ARM926T
> + select COMMON_CLK
> + select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
> + select SPARSE_IRQ
> + select ARM_AMBA
> + select ARM_VIC
> + select ARM_TIMER_SP804
> + help
> + This enables support for systems using the TI-NSPIRE CPU
Since this has all the required changes already.
> @@ -313,7 +314,7 @@ define archhelp
> echo ' Image - Uncompressed kernel image (arch/$(ARCH)/boot/Image)'
> echo '* xipImage - XIP kernel image, if configured (arch/$(ARCH)/boot/xipImage)'
> echo ' uImage - U-Boot wrapped zImage'
> - echo ' bootpImage - Combined zImage and initial RAM disk'
> + echo ' bootpImage - Combined zImage and initial RAM disk'
> echo ' (supply initrd image via make variable INITRD=<path>)'
> echo '* dtbs - Build device tree blobs for enabled boards'
> echo ' install - Install uncompressed kernel'
This looks like it wasn't meant to be in the patch.
> + tdes: tdes@...10000 {
> + reg = <0xC8010000 0x1000>;
> + };
> +
> + sha256: sha256@...00000 {
> + reg = <0xCC000000 0x1000>;
> + };
maybe rename the actual nodes to "crypto@....". The device name should
be a really generic word in general.
> + uart: uart@...20000 {
> + reg = <0x90020000 0x1000>;
> + interrupts = <1>;
> +
> + clocks = <&uart_clk>;
> + clock-names = "uart_clk";
> + };
The name for a uart should be "serial". Since this is a pl01x, please add
the required properties for the device, e.g.
compatible = "arm,pl011", "arm,primecell";
You will need the "arm,primecell" bit to make the device appear on the
amba bus rather than the platform bus.
> + timer0: timer0@...C0000 {
> + reg = <0x900C0000 0x1000>;
> + interrupts = <18>;
> +
> + clocks = <&timer_clk>;
> + clock-names = "timer_clk";
> + };
> +
> + timer1: timer1@...D0000 {
> + reg = <0x900D0000 0x1000>;
> + interrupts = <19>;
> +
> + clocks = <&timer_clk>;
> + clock-names = "timer_clk";
> + };
Name the devices "timer", not "timer0" and "timer1", the address after @ is
used to disambiguate them. There are currently patches for sp804 under
discussion on the mailing list, you should probably watch those.
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-nspire/Makefile
> @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
> +obj-y :=
> +
> +obj-y += nspire.o
The first line is not actually needed.
> +
> +#include "../../mmio.h"
> +
> +.macro addruart, rp, rv, tmp
> + ldr \rp, =(NSPIRE_EARLY_UART_PHYS_BASE) @ physical base address
> + ldr \rv, =(NSPIRE_EARLY_UART_VIRT_BASE) @ virtual base address
> +.endm
> +
> +#include <asm/hardware/debug-pl01x.S>
> +
There is no nice solution for getting the addresses here, but the consensus
was to just define the macros in this file rather than try to include a
header from elsewhere.
> + err = of_property_read_string(of_aliases, "timer0", &path);
> + if (WARN_ON(err))
> + return;
> +
> + timer = of_find_node_by_path(path);
> + base = of_iomap(timer, 0);
> + if (WARN_ON(!base))
> + return;
> +
> + clk = of_clk_get_by_name(timer, NULL);
> + clk_register_clkdev(clk, timer->name, "sp804");
> +
> + sp804_clocksource_init(base, timer->name);
> +
> + err = of_property_read_string(of_aliases, "timer1", &path);
> + if (WARN_ON(err))
> + return;
In particular, I think the method of using aliases to pick the right sp804
instance is being deprecated now. If both timers are identical, the kernel
will now just pick one of them.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists